minimalist
08-03 02:30 PM
Generally attorneys charge a retainer fee. What that means is they are willing to represent you regarding any issues with a case. Some services are covered with retainer fee and they may charge additional fee based on any extra work. For Example AC21 Retainer fee is around 750/- where they submit a G28. Then for any RFE they generally charge in the range of 250$.
wallpaper That face
nik.patelc
04-08 01:08 PM
How long it take (in terms day) to receive actual RFE mail notice after LUD status update online about RFE?
avantika.nandamuri
04-07 07:04 PM
I have valid H1 visa with Company A till sep 2009. I have applied for h1 transfer to company B in june 2008 and it's still pending without any RFE. I got an offer from Company C. Can I transfer my H1 to company C, when H1 transfer with company B is pending? Company A has revoked my H1. will that in any way affect my h1 transfer??
2011 Megan Fox: New Year New Lips
gcwait2007
10-21 10:18 AM
I am from Austin. I got my FP appointment scheduled on 11/13.
Labor PD: 02/20/2007, I-140 pending with Nebraska since 06/29/2007.
I submitted my I-485/765/131 on 8/1 to TSC and received by TSC on 8/2.
All Notice from TSC dtd 9/26
EAD card ordered on 10/3 and received on 10/10.
FP notice date 10/16 with appointment scheduled on 11/13 in San Antonio, TX.
No AP yet.
Labor PD: 02/20/2007, I-140 pending with Nebraska since 06/29/2007.
I submitted my I-485/765/131 on 8/1 to TSC and received by TSC on 8/2.
All Notice from TSC dtd 9/26
EAD card ordered on 10/3 and received on 10/10.
FP notice date 10/16 with appointment scheduled on 11/13 in San Antonio, TX.
No AP yet.
more...
yabadaba
06-30 02:41 PM
Guys,
since many of us are experts in analyzing data, leets start coming up with qualifiable impacts that can help people respond quickly to ALIF's potential lawsuit
since many of us are experts in analyzing data, leets start coming up with qualifiable impacts that can help people respond quickly to ALIF's potential lawsuit
martinvisalaw
01-26 05:30 PM
I don't want to second guess the experienced lawyers. They are probably planning on mentioning an alternative educational background as acceptable, in addition to the CIS. There is a place on the PERM form for this.
more...
puvathoor
01-29 01:48 PM
This is a good thread.. I would like to find out if I can continue my GC process if I move internationally till my PD becomes current..
I wonder what kinds of documents will be required for one to be still use the GC process..
I am going to talk to a lawyer about it and understand this.. I will post answers here..
I wonder what kinds of documents will be required for one to be still use the GC process..
I am going to talk to a lawyer about it and understand this.. I will post answers here..
2010 hair Megan Fox before and after megan fox nose job before and after. hair
gene77
07-01 11:52 PM
Ok Guys enough "PREDECTIONS" now go to bed.
Only the coming days will tell us what is going on and what will happen. Everything else is just hear-say.
Go to sleep and remember that we DO have day jobs.
Thanks eb3_nepa, I agree.
Only the coming days will tell us what is going on and what will happen. Everything else is just hear-say.
Go to sleep and remember that we DO have day jobs.
Thanks eb3_nepa, I agree.
more...
rag_1970
11-10 08:51 AM
I came to US on H4, 3 years ago. Later I took my H1B with a recruiter and got it with I-94. It was valid up to 2007 oct. But I couldn't take up any work due to some problems. Recently I went to India and came back. At the port of entry I got new I-94 with H4 stamping. Means My H1 Is not valid now ? In this case, is there any way to apply for change of status again as my H1 is valid up to 2007. Or else do I need to apply for my new H1B again ? Pl. any one clarify.
hair Below: Megan Fox#39;s New Armani
edsalbo
03-16 10:26 PM
HI,
My aunt petioned for my mom (and thus her kids) years ago, My aunt's a Us citizen, and after many years the process has started its final run. For the last two years i was an F1 student in a college in the usa and recently ive come back home; while i was there i married randomly anyway, nothing happened it wasnt a real marriage, and im getting it annuled.
So now im back home and since this process (my aunts petition) has started , im 21 but im covered aswell since the child status protection act covers me. Now, the requirements for the children (derivative beneficiaries) of the aplicant/beneficiary (my mom) to be included are to be under.. 21 (im ok in this part because of CSPA) and UNMARRIED. My question is,,, am i still gonna be included if i show my annulment certificate? as i see it the annulment itself shows that an american court declared that marriage to be voidable and not real so it should make me unmarried.right? would it also be unmarried for immigration purposes if it was divorce instead of annulment? i'd appreciate any feedback, thank you.
.
My aunt petioned for my mom (and thus her kids) years ago, My aunt's a Us citizen, and after many years the process has started its final run. For the last two years i was an F1 student in a college in the usa and recently ive come back home; while i was there i married randomly anyway, nothing happened it wasnt a real marriage, and im getting it annuled.
So now im back home and since this process (my aunts petition) has started , im 21 but im covered aswell since the child status protection act covers me. Now, the requirements for the children (derivative beneficiaries) of the aplicant/beneficiary (my mom) to be included are to be under.. 21 (im ok in this part because of CSPA) and UNMARRIED. My question is,,, am i still gonna be included if i show my annulment certificate? as i see it the annulment itself shows that an american court declared that marriage to be voidable and not real so it should make me unmarried.right? would it also be unmarried for immigration purposes if it was divorce instead of annulment? i'd appreciate any feedback, thank you.
.
more...
chaukas
06-18 12:39 AM
I haven't filed 2006 return yet. does it matter ?
hot MEGAN FOX showed off her
morchu
05-15 04:40 PM
No issues, as long as the job/position is still available (waiting) for the primary applicant.
if the primary applicant my spouse can take the extended leave on child care that is sanctioned by the employer
if the primary applicant my spouse can take the extended leave on child care that is sanctioned by the employer
more...
house MEGAN FOX: Shock of shocks,
paskal
10-02 05:39 PM
Hi Guys,
Good to see the Southerners out! Please continue this effort and help translate it into a formal IV chapter group for Loisiana (may consider combing with sorrounding states too). let me know if I can help...
Good to see the Southerners out! Please continue this effort and help translate it into a formal IV chapter group for Loisiana (may consider combing with sorrounding states too). let me know if I can help...
tattoo Megan Fox#39;s New Face: Jonah
purgan
12-20 04:38 PM
good job, pribh das. keep it up!
more...
pictures Megan Fox didn#39;t ruffle
what_now
06-22 10:50 AM
Nebraska immigration law passes - CNN.com (http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/06/22/nebraska.immigration/)
(CNN) -- Voters in Fremont, Nebraska passed a much-debated immigration measure Monday that would prohibit businesses and landlords from hiring or renting to illegal immigrants.
The ordinance had divided the community and put the eastern Nebraskan city into national headlines.
A local organization decried the new ordinance on its website.
"It is with great disappointment and sadness that tonight we acknowledge a majority of Fremont voters approving this misguided ordinance," the group called One Fremont-One Future said. "In reality, the passage of this ordinance shows that we have much work to do in our community to educate, break down barriers, and build relationships."
The American Civil Liberties Union has indicated it will file a lawsuit.
Similar measures were passed in Hazelton, Pennsylvania, and Farmers Branch, Texas, but they were later struck down by the courts.
In Hazelton, voters in 2006 approved a measure to enact practically the same law that Fremont has voted to adopt. But in July 2007, a federal judge found that immigration laws should be left solely to the federal government.
In May of 2008, a federal judge ruled the Farmers Branch law, which would bar landlords from renting to illegal immigrants, was unconstitutional.
"Those ordinances did not withstand legal scrutiny. They both failed in the courts when they were challenged," said Laurel Marsh, executive director of Nebraska's ACLU.
The reason according to Marsh: Both laws violated the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy clause and the 14th Amendment.
In addition, she said it's the federal government's responsibility to set immigration policy and "we are not well-served when communities or states try to set policy on their own."
Gregory Minchak of the National League of Cities said that it's the lack of federal immigration policy that is causing these cities to take matters into their own hands.
"Because of the absence of the feds doing anything, there's a lot of financial, cultural, political strains that are occurring [in cities and states]," he said. "They are just starting to act on their own."
(CNN) -- Voters in Fremont, Nebraska passed a much-debated immigration measure Monday that would prohibit businesses and landlords from hiring or renting to illegal immigrants.
The ordinance had divided the community and put the eastern Nebraskan city into national headlines.
A local organization decried the new ordinance on its website.
"It is with great disappointment and sadness that tonight we acknowledge a majority of Fremont voters approving this misguided ordinance," the group called One Fremont-One Future said. "In reality, the passage of this ordinance shows that we have much work to do in our community to educate, break down barriers, and build relationships."
The American Civil Liberties Union has indicated it will file a lawsuit.
Similar measures were passed in Hazelton, Pennsylvania, and Farmers Branch, Texas, but they were later struck down by the courts.
In Hazelton, voters in 2006 approved a measure to enact practically the same law that Fremont has voted to adopt. But in July 2007, a federal judge found that immigration laws should be left solely to the federal government.
In May of 2008, a federal judge ruled the Farmers Branch law, which would bar landlords from renting to illegal immigrants, was unconstitutional.
"Those ordinances did not withstand legal scrutiny. They both failed in the courts when they were challenged," said Laurel Marsh, executive director of Nebraska's ACLU.
The reason according to Marsh: Both laws violated the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy clause and the 14th Amendment.
In addition, she said it's the federal government's responsibility to set immigration policy and "we are not well-served when communities or states try to set policy on their own."
Gregory Minchak of the National League of Cities said that it's the lack of federal immigration policy that is causing these cities to take matters into their own hands.
"Because of the absence of the feds doing anything, there's a lot of financial, cultural, political strains that are occurring [in cities and states]," he said. "They are just starting to act on their own."
dresses images megan fox transformers
saimrathi
08-07 03:52 PM
EB -2 India..
congrats. was it EB2 or EB3?
All the best with I-140 (and hopefully a concurrent I-485 depending on how dates move in July :) )
congrats. was it EB2 or EB3?
All the best with I-140 (and hopefully a concurrent I-485 depending on how dates move in July :) )
more...
makeup And said model has a face like
chinna2003
05-14 11:01 PM
I have EAD through my wifes employment under Eb3 category with a PD 2005. we are expecting a baby in september, so
There is an option to avail a child care leave(4 years) and the employer will hold the job as this is official policy of the organization that belongs to a state government.Will there be a problem then being in AOS and not working and moreover recently received a RFE for EVL 2 weeks ago and we submitted it already?
There is an option to avail a child care leave(4 years) and the employer will hold the job as this is official policy of the organization that belongs to a state government.Will there be a problem then being in AOS and not working and moreover recently received a RFE for EVL 2 weeks ago and we submitted it already?
girlfriend Yes, anything Megan Fox wears
illusions
03-17 03:14 PM
Does anybody know how one can (if at all possible) to switch from EB3 to EB2 ? what is the criteria ? Has anybody done it ?
Any light on this subject will help
Any light on this subject will help
hairstyles Did Megan Fox tweak her face?
krishgreen
01-11 10:48 PM
I don't have answer to your first question. But, I went to Matamoros, Mexico in May 2010 for visa stamping. I wouldn't suggest going to Mexico if you don't have a letter from Client specifying your role on the project with project duration. I was grilled for about 20mins even though I had client letter, w2's for last 5 years. I had to stay overnight in Mexico as they have problems with their printers and could notget the visa printing done the same day. Be prepared to stay in Mexico a day or two incase if you face the same situation.
prout02
02-19 12:40 PM
So now USA considers TN as a country?? Some conspiracy, eh??
ras
01-11 11:26 PM
Hey here is a situation:
I have over 7 years of experience in IT
Come with a 4 year bachelor and 2 year masters from India from a non-computers background.
Have a diploma (1 year in computers)
few other computer certificate courses.
I work for Fortune's Best software company as sr. software qa engineer. My company wants to go ahead filing for my GC.
My company attorney says am not eligbile for EB2 based on the above but eligible for EB3. I am confused because I already have an EB2 being filed for future employment from a small company.
So I kind of guessing my company attorney's want to play safe to be on EB3 rather than EB2.
So what do u guys think that my company attorney is correct.
My understanding is that with the above qualifications, I am eligible for EB2.
Am I wrong????
I have over 7 years of experience in IT
Come with a 4 year bachelor and 2 year masters from India from a non-computers background.
Have a diploma (1 year in computers)
few other computer certificate courses.
I work for Fortune's Best software company as sr. software qa engineer. My company wants to go ahead filing for my GC.
My company attorney says am not eligbile for EB2 based on the above but eligible for EB3. I am confused because I already have an EB2 being filed for future employment from a small company.
So I kind of guessing my company attorney's want to play safe to be on EB3 rather than EB2.
So what do u guys think that my company attorney is correct.
My understanding is that with the above qualifications, I am eligible for EB2.
Am I wrong????
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий